The map at left depicts 50 repeat measurements (black dots), made using a GPS device, of a single location in Hillsborough County, Florida, near Tampa. The spatial average of the measurements (horizontal only) is shown by the green circle at the center, while degrees of spread, or estimates of precision, are shown by the blue circular zones. The central zone contains 50% of the measurements, while the outer-most zone contains about 95% of the measurements. This is a measure of the precision of the data gathering.
Horizontal accuracy of the measurements is indicated by the distance between the average of the measured points (green circle) and the reference location, which is know to be truer to the real position on the ground (red triangle). The fact that the average of the measured points lies about 3 meters southeast of the reference location indicates a bias in the measured point toward the southeast: a systematic error in accuracy.
Here is a table of the horizontal and vertical accuracy and precision for these GPS measurements.
-Horizontal precision (68%):
4.4 meters
-Horizontal Accuracy
(Distance between
average location and
reference (“true”)
point): 3.2
meters
-Vertical precision (68%): 5.7
meters
-Vertical Accuracy
(Difference between
average elevation and
reference (“true”)
point elevation):
6.0 meters
As seen in the table above, if you’re comparing horizontal to
vertical for either precision or accuracy, vertical error is larger in both
cases. If you compare horizontal
precision to horizontal accuracy, and then vertical precision to vertical
accuracy, the pairs of values are fairly similar. The 68% estimate for vertical
precision is slightly better than the vertical accuracy.
Thank you for providing the best information.I can sure this can help to update my knowledge.For more careers and latest GIS Jobs in Hyderabad.
ReplyDelete